"Ethical" Might Easily Be Replaced With The Name, 'People For The Treacherous Treatment Of Animals
Stanley Coren writes about the infamous organization PETA – ‘People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals’ and discovers their definition of “ethical” might easily be replaced with the name, ‘People for the Treacherous Treatment of Animals’
Could it be true that in an animal shelter run by a society dedicated to the ethical treatment of animals, the percentage of animals killed is nearly 95 percent while their percentage of animals successfully adopted out is less than 1 percent?”
Read his article: “When the Ethical Treatment of Animals Goes Wrong”
Is killing 95 percent of animals entrusted to a shelter ethical?
Published on April 15, 2012 by Stanley Coren, Ph.D., F.R.S.C. in Canine Corner
. . . Read More: When the Ethical Treatment of Animals Goes Wrong | Psychology Today